Multi-Disciplinary Designer based in California

Loop Case Study

Loop — Product Design Case Study

Product Design Case Study

Redesigning Loop's product experience to convert browsers into subscribers

A research-led redesign of the navigation, catalog, and product detail page — helping families discover the right gear faster and feel confident moving toward rental.

Loop
Product Designer
Navigation · Catalog · PDP
User testing · Heatmaps · Competitive audit · Journey mapping

Context

A rental model that needed to earn trust fast

Loop is a subscription service that delivers sanitized, fully assembled baby gear and toys — then picks them up when parents are done. The value proposition is strong, but the existing website wasn't communicating it clearly enough to convert first-time visitors into paying members.

My work sat squarely in the Digital Product & Engineering team's OKRs. The goals were concrete:

13%+
Increase in new customers who add items to cart, by optimizing the PDP through improved copy, UI, and storytelling.
40%+
Increase in product views by simplifying how customers experience Loop — improved navigation, search, and catalog browsing.

Research

Three research streams, one clear picture

Before touching any UI, I ran parallel research across competitive analysis, customer journey mapping, and direct user testing to understand where the experience was breaking down.

Competitive audit — 10 competitors analyzed

I audited 10 direct and adjacent competitors including Babyletto, Lovevery, Nestig, Lalo, Tumble, Docktor, and NextCo — comparing PDP structure, value communication, navigation patterns, and trust-building approaches.

Lovevery
Clear "what's included" breakdown — sets the right expectations before purchase
Babyletto
Expandable sections showing the transitional nature of the product — parallels Loop's rent-to-stage model
Nestig
Hover effects and sticky CTA on mobile — creates urgency without cluttering the page
Docktor
Custom reviews beneath key product info — addresses quality concerns at exactly the right moment
Tumble & Tumble
Hands-in-main-photo approach makes items feel real and reduces the uncertainty of renting unseen
Porter Road
Full-bleed lifestyle imagery makes the product feel premium and trustworthy from the first scroll

Key pattern: the strongest PDPs front-loaded trust signals and communicated what made their model different within the first scroll.

Customer journey map

Mapping the full journey from homepage through account settings revealed two critical emotional tension points: anxiety around item safety and sanitation on the PDP, and anxiety during the waiting period after placing an order.

Homepage → Catalog
Users feel relieved and impressed — they understand the rental model quickly, but need a stronger push into browsing.
PDP → Plans
Excitement about Loop — but questions about safety, delivery, and membership terms created hesitation right before checkout.
Post-order waiting
Anxiety spikes after purchase. Users want delivery info and order updates — needs the existing experience didn't serve.
The PDP was the highest-stakes page in the funnel — the moment a user decides whether to trust Loop with their family's needs. It needed to answer both rational and emotional questions simultaneously.
User testing findings

Moderated sessions across key pages surfaced consistent friction — especially on the PDP and Plans pages where purchase intent is highest.

PDP
One participant clicked "add to registry" when she meant to rent — renting vs. buying confusion was live in the wild.
Plans
Participants wanted delivery and pickup info before committing — this wasn't surfaced until after checkout.
Plans
Some participants thought annual meant unlimited items, monthly up to 2 — a major plan comprehension gap.
Catalog
Filter arrangement differed from how users said they'd naturally browse. Search wasn't used by any participant.
All pages
Participants wanted reassurance about item condition, sanitation, and safety — LoopCare info was buried.
Homepage
All participants understood the rental model and saw value — but few explored beyond the homepage when asked to browse.

Data

Heatmaps confirmed what testing suggested

Layering in heatmap and scroll data from the existing PDP validated qualitative findings — and revealed a critical mobile problem: trust content was falling below the fold on the device most likely to convert.

Desktop — clicks, movement + scroll
Desktop heatmap showing click and scroll data
Mobile — taps + scroll
Mobile heatmap showing click and scroll data

Desktop avg fold at 798px · Mobile avg fold at 682px. Click concentration was highest around the CTA and pricing — but scroll depth dropped sharply below the fold on mobile, meaning the LoopCare and Delivery sections were almost never seen on the device most likely to convert.


Existing UI

Where the baseline fell short

The existing PDP and navigation worked as a functional starting point — but structural issues compounded the trust and conversion problems the research had surfaced.

Existing — PDP
Existing Loop product detail page
Existing — Navigation
Existing Loop navigation
Rent vs. buy clarity
Pricing hierarchy didn't clearly signal this was a rental — leading to the real confusion observed in testing.
LoopCare buried
Safety and sanitation info was far down the page — exactly where users had already stopped scrolling.
Navigation structure
Navigation didn't reflect how users naturally browse — filters were organized around inventory, not mental models.

Redesign

Four recommendations, implemented

Research led to four clear design directions, each directly tied to a specific finding. The redesign addressed all of them across navigation, catalog, and the PDP.

  • 1
    Strengthen the rent-vs-buy value frame. Rewrote pricing copy and hierarchy so the membership saving and rental model are immediately legible — before users reach the CTA.
  • 2
    Surface LoopCare above the fold on mobile. Moved safety, sanitation, and quality assurance content higher on the PDP so it's seen before users decide to scroll — or don't.
  • 3
    Redesign filter and navigation architecture. Restructured navigation around life stage and need (Baby, Toddler, Little Kid, Play & Learn) rather than internal inventory categories — matching the mental models users described in testing.
  • 4
    Communicate scheduling and delivery expectations clearly. Added delivery timeline and scheduling info to the PDP so users feel confident before adding to bag — not anxious after.
Redesigned navigation — desktop mega menu
Redesigned Loop navigation with mega menu
Redesigned navigation — mobile
Redesigned mobile navigation
Redesigned PDP — desktop + mobile
Redesigned Loop PDP
Redesigned homepage — discovery system
Redesigned Loop homepage
Redesigned homepage — mobile
Redesigned Loop mobile homepage

The redesign introduced a structured navigation system organized by life stage, and a "pillar" PDP format that scales across breakpoints — keeping trust signals, pricing, and the CTA within the first scroll on every device.


Outcomes

Results that moved the metrics that mattered

The redesign improved two key parts of the new-customer journey: movement from homepage discovery into product exploration, and conversion behavior on the PDP.

+27%
Product views from homepage to PDP
+13%
PDP-to-cart micro-step conversion
Beyond the metrics, the work gave Loop a clearer product discovery system and a more focused PDP experience — helping families find the right gear faster and feel more confident moving toward rental.

Reflection

What this project reinforced

The most important decision was treating the PDP as a trust-building surface, not just a product listing. Loop's model requires users to give up buying certainty in exchange for flexibility — that's a higher bar than a standard e-commerce conversion. Every design decision had to serve that ask.

Layering three research methods meant no single finding carried the whole argument. When user testing, heatmaps, and journey mapping all pointed to the same gap — LoopCare content too low, delivery expectations set too late — the redesign recommendation was hard to argue against.

User testing Heatmap analysis Competitive audit Journey mapping PDP redesign Navigation architecture Conversion optimization Mobile-first design